VRHow / Headsets / Oculus Rift DK2

Oculus Rift DK2: development-kit history and specifications

Short answer: Oculus Rift DK2 was the second Oculus Rift development kit, announced in March 2014 and shipped in July 2014. It was a wired, PC-powered developer platform that added a 1080p low-persistence OLED display and camera-assisted positional tracking to the earlier DK1 design. It was not the later consumer Rift, also called CV1. Last checked October 11, 2026.

Looking for the historical background? Explore our documented history of the Oculus Rift DK2, covering its launch milestones, ecosystem development, and industry legacy.

Why the DK2 mattered

DK2 belongs to the period when Oculus was iterating hardware in public with developers before selling a consumer headset. Oculus’s later history describes the sequence plainly: first a Kickstarter, then two developer kits (DK1 and DK2), and only afterward the first consumer Rift launch. That makes “DK2” a product category as much as a model name: it was hardware intended to let developers build and test software, not a promise of consumer-ready support or a current retail experience.

The 2014 announcement positioned DK2 as the next developer kit after DK1 and as the practical form of features demonstrated in the Crystal Cove prototype. The order page opened on March 19, 2014 at $350, with shipping expected in July. A specialist specification record gives July 24, 2014 as the release date; because the announcement says only “July,” this page preserves both records rather than treating them as a contradiction. The price is a historical developer-kit price, not a current-market valuation.

Documented DK2 specification

ItemDK2 record
AnnouncedMarch 19, 2014
Release recordJuly 2014; one specialist database specifies July 24, 2014
Historical price$350 headset-only developer-kit price
DisplaySingle 5-inch OLED; 960 × 1080 per eye (1920 × 1080 total)
Refresh and persistence75 Hz, 72 Hz or 60 Hz modes; 2 ms, 3 ms or full-persistence modes
Optics and field of viewAspherical lenses; about 100° nominal in the announcement, while VRcompare records 93° horizontal
TrackingOnboard gyroscope, accelerometer and magnetometer, plus camera-based outside-in positional tracking from IR LEDs and the included near-infrared camera
ConnectionsDetachable 10-foot cable; HDMI 1.4b video and USB 2.0; the camera also uses USB 2.0
Weight440 g without cable in the launch specification
PlatformPC-powered; the historical specification record lists Oculus Home

Field-of-view source conflict: Road to VR reproduces the launch specification’s nominal 100° figure, while VRcompare records 93° horizontal. They may reflect different measurement conventions; this page reports both and does not present either as a universally measured value. Road to VR’s launch table says 440 g without cable; VRcompare lists 440 g with headstrap, so the page does not silently merge those measurement descriptions.

DK2 versus DK1

The important distinction is not simply “more pixels.” Road to VR’s comparison records DK1 as a 1280 × 800 LCD headset weighing 380 g, while DK2 used a 1920 × 1080 OLED panel and weighed 440 g. DK2’s panel was described as low-persistence, and the launch specification exposed selectable refresh and persistence modes. Those are documented hardware characteristics; this page does not turn them into an unsupported comfort, sharpness or performance review.

Tracking is the larger architectural change. DK1 supplied rotational sensing through its inertial unit; DK2 retained inertial sensors but added infrared LEDs in the headset and a custom camera, allowing camera-assisted positional tracking when the camera could see the headset. In other words, DK2 is a 6DoF-capable outside-in system in the historical specification record, not an inside-out headset with cameras built primarily to map a room. The camera and its USB connection were part of the DK2 setup described in the launch report.

Connectivity also changed. The DK1 used a separate control box, whereas the DK2 integrated that functionality into the headset and used one detachable cable that split to HDMI and USB. That is a hardware distinction, not evidence that modern operating systems or applications will still support the device.

DK2 versus CV1

CV1 means the first consumer Oculus Rift, not “DK2 with a different name.” Meta’s retrospective dates the consumer Rift launch to March 2016 and explicitly describes the path as DK1, DK2, then the first Rift launch. DK2 therefore predates CV1 by roughly two years and should not be listed as a consumer release. The two names also signal different purposes: DK2 was sold as a developer kit at a historical $350 headset-only price, while CV1 was the consumer Rift product that followed. This page makes no claim about CV1’s own specifications, accessories or support because they are outside this topic.

Evidence-based timeline and present-day caveat

  1. 2012–2013: Oculus’s first Kickstarter-era development kit, DK1, reached developers; the later comparison identifies DK2 as the next iteration.
  2. March 19, 2014: Oculus announced DK2 and opened $350 pre-orders, with July shipping expected.
  3. July 2014: The DK2 release period began; VRcompare records July 24.
  4. March 2016: Meta’s retrospective identifies the consumer Oculus Rift/CV1 launch.

VRcompare marks DK2 discontinued, and the historical sources describe it as a developer kit. Consequently, a second-hand unit should be treated as legacy hardware for archival or development-history purposes. This page does not claim present-day driver compatibility, application compatibility, a working used-market supply, or any particular PC requirement. Those questions depend on software and operating-system versions that are not established by the sources opened for this page.

Verification and limitations

The page uses an official Meta historical account for the DK1-to-DK2-to-CV1 sequence, a contemporaneous specialist report that reproduces Oculus’s launch specification, and a specialist database as a cross-check. The source records disagree on field-of-view wording and on whether the weight description includes the headstrap or cable; both descriptions are shown. No hands-on testing, performance score, modern support claim or invented specification is included.

Sources

Related